Are you loving photography
Picking the Right Digital SLR for Your Nature Photography
Truly it doesn't make a difference what hardware you utilize - it's your main thing with the camera that issues. In any case, there is no doubt that when you're climbing through a thick wilderness amidst focal america you need to pack light. Despite the fact that the Nikon D2x has the notoriety of being Nikon's chief "Professional" camera, you may not discover it's the best fit for your inclination work.
One of the principal things you have to consider is the manner by which you will utilize the photos. Look into the magazines you need to distribute your work. Send in for "accommodation rules" and discover their base super pixel check. The same is valid for stock organizations - peruse around and choose which put you'd at last get a kick out of the chance to offer your work. Numerous associations have their accommodation guideliens distributed on their sites. In case you're more keen on learning and doing nature photography for your own particular joy then by all methods purchase the more affordable models. There's nothing amiss with a camera that takes a 5 or 6 megapixel picture. Regardless you'll have the capacity to explode it to blurb measure in the event that you need a unique print made.
Picking the Right Lenses
Lamentably, nobody can disclose to you which focal points to purchase or "how to manufacture the ideal SLR framework for nature photography." Again, it relies upon the sorts of photographs you get a kick out of the chance to take, your own inclination and the market where you need to offer your picture.
The colossal preferred standpoint of Nikon cameras is that you can utilize more established focal points on your body. This permits significantly more opportunity of decision and means you can get truly astounding more established focal points at shockingly moderate costs.
I'll give you an illustration. One of my most loved focal points is a 300mm f4 manual concentration prime focal point from the 1970s. It cost just $350 CAD (which means it would be considerably less costly in American dollars) and the glass is still ED! Nikon particularly created ED (Extra-low Dispersion) glass to give pricise optical shading rectification. This uncommon glass (not accessible in all Nikon focal points) gives the sharp, clear determination required for wonderful photos. The other preferred standpoint (in any event for me since I by and large climb to discover natural life) is that it measures less and packs little.
Another case - the 50mm 1.4 auto center focal point (it's hard to believe, but it's true f1.4!) offers for just $166 CAD (once more, considerably less in American dollars). It's really a 80mm on your body. That implies you have a prime focal point at 80mm that can take pictures in the darkest settings. Also, on the grounds that Nikon has been idealizing its 50mm focal points since its origin as an organization (Nikon used to incorporate a 50mm on every one of its bodies until well into the late 1980s), it's one of Nikon's absolute best focal points. It's shabby in light of the fact that 50mm on a 35mm camera is somewhat pooey. In any case, 80mm on a digial camera is superb.
Amplification - Use it to your Advantage
For natural life picture takers specifically, the one preferred standpoint of shooting with any Nikon computerized camera nowadays is the amplification factor. Instead of make a sensor an indistinguishable size from one casing of 35mm film, Nikon and most other computerized SLR camera producers chose to make a sensor that is littler than the 24x36mm standard casing of the more seasoned film models. Having a littler sensor implies you wouldn't catch all the data on the left and right and best and base of the casing. This may sound truly terrible... be that as it may, there is no compelling reason to stress over what you haven't caught in light of the fact that the viewfinder has been balanced with the goal that what you see optically is what is caught in the computerized document.
The outcome is that the camera duplicates the amplification of the considerable number of focal points. Nikon's amplification (contingent upon the camera you utilize) is around 1.5x. That implies a 300mm focal point is currently amplified to 450mm. This is awesome news for untamed life picture takers. The main downside is that more extensive point focal points (like a 17mm wide edge turns into a 25.5mm not far reaching edge focal point. In any case, scene picture takers still have a few alternatives. I'll get to those in a bit.
Focal points - Pros and Cons
While I can't reveal to you the correct focal points to purchase for your particualr needs... I can give you some criticism/impressions about the specific focal points I am utilizing or have utilized as a part of the past.
Nikkor 10.5mm f2.8 Fisheye: I never thought such a particular focal point could furnish me with so much utilize. For more data, I've composed a short article about how to utilize a fisheye focal point in your tendency photography athttp://www.naturestocklibrary.com/display/2472892
Nikkor 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5G ED-IF AF-S DX Zoom - This focal point is good. I got it as a pack focal point quite a while back and it's served well for the more extensive territory. I wish I had spared pennies and acquired a 2.8 that offered a more extensive territory (like a 12mm to 25mm).
Tamron 17-35mm f2.8: This is an awesome focal point at the same time, tsk-tsk, I bought it for a film camera and the amplification on my computerized body implies that it isn't that valuable in my photography at the present time. I'm anticipating offering it (alongside my other wide edge) and purchasing a 2.8 that has a more extensive territory so I can accomplish more with scene photography.
Nikkor 50mm f/1.4D AF - This is a similar focal point I examined before. It's little, has a low sticker price, enables you to shoot in truly dull circumstances and it's a 80mm on a computerized camera. You truly can't turn out badly.
Nikkor Nikon 80-200mm f2.8D ED AF Zoom - This is a fabulous focal point that stays at 2.8 regardless of in the event that you are shooting at 80 or 200mm. Once more, amplification implies it's really a 300mm zoom. Zooms are incredible on the grounds that you can change your attention separate contingent upon where your subject is found. Not very good with subjects that are constantly far away (like the macaws seen here), however truly wonderful for easygoing natural life like deer. It additionally has a full scale work that works wonderfully.
Nikkor 105mm f/2.8D AF Micro, or 105 Micro for short - This is likely Nikon's most utilized full scale focal point, presumably on the grounds that the focal point can serve triple obligation. Most importantly, it is a large scale photography focal point and it enables you to take photos at a 1:1 propagation proportion (on a 35mm body), which implies that a 24 by 36 mm subject will fill the whole edge. Second, it influences a decent universally useful to short zooming focal point. Third, it is likewise no less than an exceptionally sensible picture focal point (in spite of the fact that, with amplification it might be excessively of a fax on an advanced SLR). I truly adore this focal point for large scale photography.
Nikkor 300mm f4 manual concentration - While a "prime" focal point doesn't offer the flexibilty of a zoom... it's as yet a perfect decision for getting the best outcomes in your work. This is a similar focal point I talked about before and, thinking of it as cost just $350, it's light and the centering is so smooth, it's one of my most loved focal points. I never leave home without it.
Nikkor 600mm f5.6 manual concentration ED Glass - Again, I paid significantly less for this focal point (which is really a robust 900mm on an advanced body and furthermore has the celebrated Nikon ED glass!!) since it's a more established model and it's manual core interest. I burned through $1,599 USD - however think about that as a more current model would go for in any event $5,000 to $25,000, contingent upon the f stop. Some may contend that 5.6 is a bit excessively thin of a f stop yet I discover the pressure with zooming focal points implies that I wouldn't have any desire to shoot a 900mm subject with anything more extensive than 5.6 (2.8 would make the concentrate unreasonably shallow on such a distant subject). In spite of the fact that... for nearer subjects 2.8 is enchantment!
Previously, I have likewise utilized the Sigma 70-300mm 3.5-5.6 and the Tamron 200-400mm 3.5-5.6 and both served well as reasonable zooms while I was finding out about photography. I have since sold them to pay for the focal points I at present utilize.
Why I LOVE and Highly Recommend Manual Focus
I used to be panicked of centering physically. On most auto center focal points, the concentration ring is little and more hard to utilize... additionally there's something truly simple about simply enabling your camera to do the centering work for you. I was apprehensive I couldn't respond rapidly enough to moving subjects and that I wouldn't be comparable to my camera's auto center. Presently I see the mistakes of my ways.
For natural life (or individuals), you need to ensure the principle subject's eyes are in idealize center. You won't have the capacity to offer any picture if the eyes aren't in center. In the event that you shoot a subject 10 feet away at 2.8 and utilize auto center, the camera will pick the protest nearer to the camera (for the most part the nose, cheek, or eye forehead... not simply the eye). A 2.8 opening implies that you will have such a delicate profundity of field that the eyes will show up out of core interest. The more seasoned (and more moderate) manual concentration focal points have the most excellent centering rings you've ever observed. I think that its substantially less demanding to utilize manual concentrate on my 300mm f4 focal point from the 1970s than my fresher self-adjust 80-200mm zoom (utilizing the auto center element). Unfortuately, I discover the concentrating ring on the more up to date models a tad pooey... in any case, I wanted to put forth the defense for why I think manual concentration focal points from the 1970s are the best things since cut bread!
Truly it doesn't make a difference what hardware you utilize - it's your main thing with the camera that issues. In any case, there is no doubt that when you're climbing through a thick wilderness amidst focal america you need to pack light. Despite the fact that the Nikon D2x has the notoriety of being Nikon's chief "Professional" camera, you may not discover it's the best fit for your inclination work.
One of the principal things you have to consider is the manner by which you will utilize the photos. Look into the magazines you need to distribute your work. Send in for "accommodation rules" and discover their base super pixel check. The same is valid for stock organizations - peruse around and choose which put you'd at last get a kick out of the chance to offer your work. Numerous associations have their accommodation guideliens distributed on their sites. In case you're more keen on learning and doing nature photography for your own particular joy then by all methods purchase the more affordable models. There's nothing amiss with a camera that takes a 5 or 6 megapixel picture. Regardless you'll have the capacity to explode it to blurb measure in the event that you need a unique print made.
Picking the Right Lenses
Lamentably, nobody can disclose to you which focal points to purchase or "how to manufacture the ideal SLR framework for nature photography." Again, it relies upon the sorts of photographs you get a kick out of the chance to take, your own inclination and the market where you need to offer your picture.
The colossal preferred standpoint of Nikon cameras is that you can utilize more established focal points on your body. This permits significantly more opportunity of decision and means you can get truly astounding more established focal points at shockingly moderate costs.
I'll give you an illustration. One of my most loved focal points is a 300mm f4 manual concentration prime focal point from the 1970s. It cost just $350 CAD (which means it would be considerably less costly in American dollars) and the glass is still ED! Nikon particularly created ED (Extra-low Dispersion) glass to give pricise optical shading rectification. This uncommon glass (not accessible in all Nikon focal points) gives the sharp, clear determination required for wonderful photos. The other preferred standpoint (in any event for me since I by and large climb to discover natural life) is that it measures less and packs little.
Another case - the 50mm 1.4 auto center focal point (it's hard to believe, but it's true f1.4!) offers for just $166 CAD (once more, considerably less in American dollars). It's really a 80mm on your body. That implies you have a prime focal point at 80mm that can take pictures in the darkest settings. Also, on the grounds that Nikon has been idealizing its 50mm focal points since its origin as an organization (Nikon used to incorporate a 50mm on every one of its bodies until well into the late 1980s), it's one of Nikon's absolute best focal points. It's shabby in light of the fact that 50mm on a 35mm camera is somewhat pooey. In any case, 80mm on a digial camera is superb.
Amplification - Use it to your Advantage
For natural life picture takers specifically, the one preferred standpoint of shooting with any Nikon computerized camera nowadays is the amplification factor. Instead of make a sensor an indistinguishable size from one casing of 35mm film, Nikon and most other computerized SLR camera producers chose to make a sensor that is littler than the 24x36mm standard casing of the more seasoned film models. Having a littler sensor implies you wouldn't catch all the data on the left and right and best and base of the casing. This may sound truly terrible... be that as it may, there is no compelling reason to stress over what you haven't caught in light of the fact that the viewfinder has been balanced with the goal that what you see optically is what is caught in the computerized document.
The outcome is that the camera duplicates the amplification of the considerable number of focal points. Nikon's amplification (contingent upon the camera you utilize) is around 1.5x. That implies a 300mm focal point is currently amplified to 450mm. This is awesome news for untamed life picture takers. The main downside is that more extensive point focal points (like a 17mm wide edge turns into a 25.5mm not far reaching edge focal point. In any case, scene picture takers still have a few alternatives. I'll get to those in a bit.
Focal points - Pros and Cons
While I can't reveal to you the correct focal points to purchase for your particualr needs... I can give you some criticism/impressions about the specific focal points I am utilizing or have utilized as a part of the past.
Nikkor 10.5mm f2.8 Fisheye: I never thought such a particular focal point could furnish me with so much utilize. For more data, I've composed a short article about how to utilize a fisheye focal point in your tendency photography athttp://www.naturestocklibrary.com/display/2472892
Nikkor 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5G ED-IF AF-S DX Zoom - This focal point is good. I got it as a pack focal point quite a while back and it's served well for the more extensive territory. I wish I had spared pennies and acquired a 2.8 that offered a more extensive territory (like a 12mm to 25mm).
Tamron 17-35mm f2.8: This is an awesome focal point at the same time, tsk-tsk, I bought it for a film camera and the amplification on my computerized body implies that it isn't that valuable in my photography at the present time. I'm anticipating offering it (alongside my other wide edge) and purchasing a 2.8 that has a more extensive territory so I can accomplish more with scene photography.
Nikkor 50mm f/1.4D AF - This is a similar focal point I examined before. It's little, has a low sticker price, enables you to shoot in truly dull circumstances and it's a 80mm on a computerized camera. You truly can't turn out badly.
Nikkor Nikon 80-200mm f2.8D ED AF Zoom - This is a fabulous focal point that stays at 2.8 regardless of in the event that you are shooting at 80 or 200mm. Once more, amplification implies it's really a 300mm zoom. Zooms are incredible on the grounds that you can change your attention separate contingent upon where your subject is found. Not very good with subjects that are constantly far away (like the macaws seen here), however truly wonderful for easygoing natural life like deer. It additionally has a full scale work that works wonderfully.
Nikkor 105mm f/2.8D AF Micro, or 105 Micro for short - This is likely Nikon's most utilized full scale focal point, presumably on the grounds that the focal point can serve triple obligation. Most importantly, it is a large scale photography focal point and it enables you to take photos at a 1:1 propagation proportion (on a 35mm body), which implies that a 24 by 36 mm subject will fill the whole edge. Second, it influences a decent universally useful to short zooming focal point. Third, it is likewise no less than an exceptionally sensible picture focal point (in spite of the fact that, with amplification it might be excessively of a fax on an advanced SLR). I truly adore this focal point for large scale photography.
Nikkor 300mm f4 manual concentration - While a "prime" focal point doesn't offer the flexibilty of a zoom... it's as yet a perfect decision for getting the best outcomes in your work. This is a similar focal point I talked about before and, thinking of it as cost just $350, it's light and the centering is so smooth, it's one of my most loved focal points. I never leave home without it.
Nikkor 600mm f5.6 manual concentration ED Glass - Again, I paid significantly less for this focal point (which is really a robust 900mm on an advanced body and furthermore has the celebrated Nikon ED glass!!) since it's a more established model and it's manual core interest. I burned through $1,599 USD - however think about that as a more current model would go for in any event $5,000 to $25,000, contingent upon the f stop. Some may contend that 5.6 is a bit excessively thin of a f stop yet I discover the pressure with zooming focal points implies that I wouldn't have any desire to shoot a 900mm subject with anything more extensive than 5.6 (2.8 would make the concentrate unreasonably shallow on such a distant subject). In spite of the fact that... for nearer subjects 2.8 is enchantment!
Previously, I have likewise utilized the Sigma 70-300mm 3.5-5.6 and the Tamron 200-400mm 3.5-5.6 and both served well as reasonable zooms while I was finding out about photography. I have since sold them to pay for the focal points I at present utilize.
Why I LOVE and Highly Recommend Manual Focus
I used to be panicked of centering physically. On most auto center focal points, the concentration ring is little and more hard to utilize... additionally there's something truly simple about simply enabling your camera to do the centering work for you. I was apprehensive I couldn't respond rapidly enough to moving subjects and that I wouldn't be comparable to my camera's auto center. Presently I see the mistakes of my ways.
For natural life (or individuals), you need to ensure the principle subject's eyes are in idealize center. You won't have the capacity to offer any picture if the eyes aren't in center. In the event that you shoot a subject 10 feet away at 2.8 and utilize auto center, the camera will pick the protest nearer to the camera (for the most part the nose, cheek, or eye forehead... not simply the eye). A 2.8 opening implies that you will have such a delicate profundity of field that the eyes will show up out of core interest. The more seasoned (and more moderate) manual concentration focal points have the most excellent centering rings you've ever observed. I think that its substantially less demanding to utilize manual concentrate on my 300mm f4 focal point from the 1970s than my fresher self-adjust 80-200mm zoom (utilizing the auto center element). Unfortuately, I discover the concentrating ring on the more up to date models a tad pooey... in any case, I wanted to put forth the defense for why I think manual concentration focal points from the 1970s are the best things since cut bread!
Comments
Post a Comment